Video: Lightning strikes Airbus A380

Last month, a man named Chris Dawson was videotaping an Emirates Airbus A380 on approach to London’s Heathrow Airport during a thunderstorm, when a bolt of lightning struck the plane.  As the short video above shows, the bolt seemed to travel through the plane — the largest passenger aircraft in service — on its way to the ground.

Although it looks frightening, aircraft are designed to handle lightning strikes — in fact, planes are struck by lightning several times a year on average.  They are designed to allow the energy to pass through the metal frame with no harm to the plane’s structure, electronics or the people inside. [Daily Mail via Gizmodo]

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amateur videos from Lambert-St. Louis Airport during tornado

Last night, severe thunderstorms impacted the St. Louis area, and a tornado struck the Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.  Despite widespread damage which immediately closed the airport, there were no deaths or serious injuries — five people were taken to hospitals for treatment.  Lambert’s Concourse C suffered the brunt of the storm, which is used by Air Tran, American Airlines, Cape Air and Frontier Airlines.  Incoming flights were diverted (mostly to Kansas City or Indianapolis) or canceled.

Several passengers inside the airport caught the chaos and ensuing damage from the storm on their cameras/cell phones.  Here are a few videos that have been uploaded to YouTube:

The most dramatic video was filmed at a Southwest Airlines gate in Concourse E, showing strong winds and heavy rain bands outside the large windows.  As the storm intensifies, an employee yells for people to move to safety. (Note: This video was credited to Bryce Moore by KMOV; the original video is no longer publicly available — this is a copy.)

A short video showing some of the damage inside Concourse C immediately following the storm:

And another video of passengers taking shelter, and being given some information from an airport employee:

The airport remains closed today, and officials are hoping to be back in partial operation tomorrow.

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

New airline rules: What they mean for you

Effective August 23, new regulations imposed on airlines by the Department of Transportation intend to improve the experience (and reduce some of the frustrations) for air travelers.  Here’s a breakdown of the new rules, and how they may help you (or not):

Lost Bags and Bag Fees: Airlines will now be required to refund any fee for carrying a bag if the bag is lost.

This seems like a no-brainer — if the airline misplaces your bag, they should refund the baggage fee you paid to check it.  And from what I’ve seen and heard, airlines were already doing this as a conciliatory gesture when they lost a passenger’s bag.  But now it’s official — they have to do it.  What it doesn’t do: Unfortunately, the new rule does not address any timeframe for delivering the bag to the carousel.  If you’ve ever had to wait over an hour for your bag to appear, you know how frustrating that can be — especially with the sting of knowing you paid the airline $25 to handle said bag.

Full Disclosure of Additional Fees. Airlines will also have to prominently disclose all potential fees…

Anyone who’s ever purchased an airfare knows that the price given is never the total amount you end up paying.  For example, an upcoming fare from New York to Los Angeles is advertised at $148.  But add in the US Transportation Tax ($11), security fee ($2.50), Passenger Facility Charge ($4.50) and the Flight Segment Tax ($3.70), and you end up paying about $170 to secure your ticket.  Checking a bag? That’s another $25, payable at check-in.  Hungry? $8 for a boxed meal.  (And if you’re looking at an international flight, expect some hefty fuel surcharges, too.)  With this new rule, airlines must advertise all fees upfront.  What it doesn’t do: the DOT did not specify how the fees must be displayed to the customer. A common standard, such as those done for credit card solicitations and nutritional information on food labels, would be helpful for consumers.

Bumping. Today’s rule doubles the amount of money passengers are eligible to be compensated for in the event they are involuntarily bumped from an oversold flight.

I covered bumping pretty extensively in my “When Something Goes Wrong” article on Traveltorial.  Essentially, most airlines oversell their flights because there are almost always no-shows for flights.  But it’s a balancing act for them — sell as many seats as possible, but make sure everyone who needs to fly can get a seat.  It’s a practice that makes a lot more money for airlines, but treats passengers as pawns in a complicated chess game — and if there are more people at the gate than there are seats, airlines are required by law to handsomely compensate those who are “involuntarily denied boarding.”  This new rule does two important things: it doubles the amount of money owed to the displaced passenger (to specific maximums up to $1,300), and it also puts a cash value on tickets obtained using reward miles (the lowest one-way price paid for a seat in the same cabin class).  What it doesn’t do: outlaw the practice of overselling flights.

Tarmac Delays. The new rule expands the existing ban on lengthy tarmac delays to cover foreign airlines’ operations at U.S. airports…

For about a year, and after some high-profile incidents, U.S. airlines operating domestic flights could not keep passengers stuck on the tarmac more than three hours — or else the airline would face a very hefty fine.  The rule essentially eradicated all chance of a plane sitting on the tarmac for more than three hours.  However, the rule only applied to domestic flights.  The new regulation expands the rule to include international flights, including those operated by foreign carriers.  The time limit for international flights will be four hours.  What it doesn’t do: No complaints here — this is actually a major regulation that will save thousands of passengers the nightmare of being stuck inside cramped planes for seemingly endless hours.

The new regulations also mandate that airfares purchased at least one week in advance are fully refundable within 24 hours, or a reservation can be held without payment for 24 hours.  Most U.S. carriers already did this; now it’s required.

Another mandate: carriers must promptly notify passengers of any delays greater than 30 minutes, as well as cancellations and diversions.

Overall, these are positive changes that will benefit passengers and maintain standard of levels of service for all airlines.  But there was one proposed idea that I had hoped would make it into these regulations: requiring airlines not to charge for a passenger’s first checked bag.  One frequent gripe from passengers is the amount of carry-on bags that fellow passengers are cramming into the overhead bins.  It is also a burden for flight attendants who are trying to get passengers settled, and a costly burden for the TSA which needs to screen all of those bags.  But airlines have made a ton of money on checked bag fees, and their lobbyists were successful in keeping this proposal out of the final regulations.  Oh well.

Posted in Air Travel, Industry | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Video: A380 clips regional jet while taxiing at JFK

Last night, an Air France Airbus A380 (the largest passenger plane in service) was taxiing to a runway at JFK International Airport in New York City when its left wing clipped the tail of of a Comair (operating for Delta) Bombardier CRJ700.  The incident was captured on video:

The Comair jet had just parked on the tarmac with 66 passengers and crew on board — luckily, no one on the plane was injured.  (This is why they tell you to keep your seatbelt fastened until you arrive at the gate!)  The A380, which was supposed to take off for Paris, was taken out of service after suffering minimal damage to its wing — its 495 passengers were taken off the plane and put up in hotels for the night and/or re-accommodated on other flights.  The National Transportation Safety Board will investigate the incident.

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Pilot’s perspective: En route to Japan when disaster strikes

A Delta Airlines A330 at Narita Airport in Japan

On March 11, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Japan, damaging buildings and triggering tsunami waves which obliterated coastal towns.  At the same time, dozens of long-haul flights were en route to Tokyo’s Narita airport — which, along with other airports in the country, were immediately shut down pending damage assessments.  All of those planes had to be diverted…and fast!

Last week, a member of the online forum FlyerTalk reposted a Delta pilot’s first-hand account of the experience.  The poster redacted the pilot’s name, the flight number and the type of equipment being flown.  You can read the original post here along with other forum members’ comments, but here is the entire account as posted:

I’m currently still in one piece, writing from my room in the Narita crew hotel. It’s 8am. This is my inaugural trans-pacific trip as a brand new, recently checked out, international XXX Captain and it has been interesting, to say the least, so far. I’ve crossed the Atlantic three times so far so the ocean crossing procedures were familiar.

By the way, stunning scenery flying over the Aleutian Islands. Everything was going fine until 100 miles out from Tokyo and in the descent for arrival. The first indication of any trouble was that Japan air traffic control started putting everyone into holding patterns. At first we thought it was usual congestion on arrival. Then we got a company data link message advising about the earthquake, followed by another stating Narita airport was temporarily closed for inspection and expected to open shortly (the company is always so positive).

From our perspective things were obviously looking a little different. The Japanese controller’s anxiety level seemed quite high and he said expect “indefinite” holding time. No one would commit to a time frame on that so I got my copilot and relief pilot busy looking at divert stations and our fuel situation, which, after an ocean crossing is typically low.

It wasn’t long, maybe ten minutes, before the first pilots started requesting diversions to other airports. Air Canada, American, United, etc. all reporting minimal fuel situations. I still had enough fuel for 1.5 to 2.0 hours of holding. Needless to say, the diverts started complicating the situation.

Japan air traffic control then announced Narita was closed indefinitely due to damage. Planes immediately started requesting arrivals into Haneda, near Tokyo, a half dozen JAL and western planes got clearance in that direction but then ATC announced Haneda had just closed. Uh oh! Now instead of just holding, we all had to start looking at more distant alternatives like Osaka, or Nagoya.

One bad thing about a large airliner is that you can’t just be-bop into any little airport. We generally need lots of runway. With more planes piling in from both east and west, all needing a place to land and several now fuel critical ATC was getting over-whelmed. In the scramble, and without waiting for my fuel to get critical, I got my flight a clearance to head for Nagoya, fuel situation still okay. So far so good. A few minutes into heading that way, I was “ordered” by ATC to reverse course. Nagoya was saturated with traffic and unable to handle more planes (read-airport full). Ditto for Osaka.

With that statement, my situation went instantly from fuel okay, to fuel minimal considering we might have to divert a much farther distance. Multiply my situation by a dozen other aircraft all in the same boat, all making demands requests and threats to ATC for clearances somewhere. Air Canada and then someone else went to “emergency” fuel situation. Planes started to heading for air force bases. The nearest to Tokyo was Yokoda AFB. I threw my hat in the ring for that initially. The answer – Yokoda closed! no more space.

By now it was a three ring circus in the cockpit, my copilot on the radios, me flying and making decisions and the relief copilot buried in the air charts trying to figure out where to go that was within range while data link messages were flying back and forth between us and company dispatch in Atlanta. I picked Misawa AFB at the north end of Honshu island. We could get there with minimal fuel remaining. ATC was happy to get rid of us so we cleared out of the maelstrom of the Tokyo region. We heard ATC try to send planes toward Sendai, a small regional airport on the coast which was later the one I think that got flood ed by a tsunami.

Atlanta dispatch then sent us a message asking if we could continue to Chitose airport on the Island of Hokkaido, north of Honshu. Other Delta planes were heading that way. More scrambling in the cockpit – check weather, check charts, check fuel, okay. We could still make it and not be going into a fuel critical situation … if we had no other fuel delays. As we approached Misawa we got clearance to continue to Chitose. Critical decision thought process. Let’s see – trying to help company – plane overflies perfectly good divert airport for one farther away…wonder how that will look in the safety report, if anything goes wrong.

Suddenly ATC comes up and gives us a vector to a fix well short of Chitose and tells us to standby for holding instructions. Nightmare realized. Situation rapidly deteriorating. After initially holding near Tokyo, starting a divert to Nagoya, reversing course back to Tokyo then to re-di verting north toward Misawa, all that happy fuel reserve that I had was vaporizing fast. My subsequent conversation, paraphrased of course…., went something like this:

“Sapparo Control – Delta XX requesting immediate clearance direct to
Chitose,minimum fuel, unable hold.”

“Negative Ghost-Rider, the Pattern is full” <<< top gun quote <<<

“Sapparo Control – make that – Delta XX declaring emergency, low fuel,
proceeding direct Chitose”

“Roger Delta XX, understood, you are cleared direct to Chitose, contact
Chitose approach….etc….”

Enough was enough, I had decided to preempt actually running critically low on fuel while in another indefinite holding pattern, especially after bypassing Misawa, and played my last ace…declaring an emergency. The problem with that is now I have a bit of company paperwork to do but what the heck.

As it was – landed Chitose, safe. That’s always a good feeling, being safe. They taxied us off to some remote parking area where we shut down and watched a half dozen or more other airplanes come streaming in. In the end, Delta had two 747s, my XXX and another 767 and a 777 all on the ramp at Chitose. We saw to American airlines planes, a United and two Air Canada as well. Not to mention several extra Al Nippon and Japan Air Lines planes.

Post-script – 9 hours later, Japan airlines finally got around to getting a boarding ladder to the plane where we were able to get off and clear customs. – that however, is another interesting story.

By the way – while writing this – I have felt four additional tremors that shook the hotel slightly – all in 45 minutes.

Cheers,

(omitted)

Posted in Air Travel, Delta | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Was an air traffic controller asleep in the tower at DCA?

Planes await take-off at Washington's Reagan National Airport

Just past midnight on Wednesday morning, American Airlines flight 1012 from Miami was on approach to to Washington, DC’s Reagan National Airport, descending through an altitude of 1,000 feet, when the pilot aborted the approach and performed a fly-around.  The reason: the pilot could not reach anyone in the airport’s control tower.  On the second approach, the pilot landed the plane with no assistance from the airport, as if he were landing at an “uncontrolled airport” simply relying on visual and instrument cues.

Several minutes later, an arriving United Airlines flight also landed on its own, after its pilot also failed to reach anyone in the tower.

According to ABC News:

“Tower is apparently unmanned. Called on the phone. Nobody answering, so aircraft went in just as an uncontrolled airport,” one pilot said according to recorded radio communication.

In another transmission, a pilot said that “it’s happened before.”

One aviation official told The Associated Press that the single controller scheduled to be on duty at the time had fallen asleep. Others have speculated that the controller may have been locked out of the tower.

ABC News also reports that U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today directed that the airport have two airport controllers working the midnight shift.  The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating the incident.

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Boeing’s new 747-8 takes to the sky

Check out the flight path above for an airliner, from earlier today. Did a pilot get lost?  Or bored?  Nope — It was actually the inaugural flight for Boeing’s newest model 747 aircraft, the 747-8, and the largest passenger aircraft yet for Boeing with up to 467 seats in a three-class configuration.  The flight took off from Paine Field in Everett, Washington, adjacent to Boeing’s massive assembly plant.  It landed four-and-a-half hours later at nearby Boeing Field.  In the meantime, the plane underwent operational testing along the crazy spaghetti-shaped pattern shown above.  (View the full stats for Boeing Flight #8 at FlightAware.com here.)  Video of the plane’s take-off is below, courtesy of airlinereporter.com:

Boeing touts the 747-8′s advanced fuel efficiency and economies-of-scale in carrying more passengers than earlier models.  It is meant to rival the fully double-decker Airbus A380, which carries 525 passengers in a three-class configuration.

The 747-8 is scheduled for its first deliveries by the end of the year.  So far, Lufthansa and Korean Air have orders for the new model.

A cargo version of the 747-8 has been undergoing flight testing for six weeks now, and will be delivered to customers beginning this summer.

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

College student arrested for TSA protest files civil rights lawsuit

Aaron Tobey, a 21-year-old student at the University of Cincinnati, needed to fly from Richmond, Virginia, to Wisconsin on December 30 for his grandmother’s funeral.  However, Tobey — like many Americans — disagreed with the recently-enacted TSA security screenings involving full-body scanners and enhanced pat-down techniques.  And like others have done before him, Tobey decided to express his views at the airport in a non-confrontational way. He stripped down to his shorts and revealed something written on his chest: the Fourth Amendment.  The message read, “Amendment 4: The right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated.”

But officers at Richmond International Airport did not take kindly to this silent expression of speech — Tobey was detained, handcuffed, photographed, questioned about any ties to terrorist organizations, threatened with transfer to a county jail and had some of his personal property destroyed.  After 90 minutes, officers charged him with disorderly conduct and allowed him to continue his journey.

Two weeks later, county prosecutors dropped the disorderly conduct charge.

Several video reports, including an interview, from Richmond station CBS6 WTVR can be viewed here.

Now, Tobey has filed a civil rights lawsuit, claiming wrongful detention and violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights.  The lawsuit is seeking $250,000 in damages.  You can read the filing here.  [Wired]

Posted in Air Travel, Security | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

FAA yanks life-saving oxygen from all airplane lavatories

A rather shocking air safety development was revealed today, thanks to Houston’s KPRC Local 2 News: Last April, the Federal Aviation Administration ordered U.S. airlines to remove emergency oxygen generators from their aircraft restrooms.  The reason, apparently, was due to concern that a passenger could tamper with the equipment and use the oxygen as a flammable accelerant, all while out-of-view of flight crew and other passengers.

The FAA did not publicize “Air Worthiness Directive (2011-04-09)” until all airlines completed the work of removing the oxygen generators from all 6,000 commercial U.S. aircraft, which was finished last Friday, March 4.

Aircraft decompression events are extremely rare, but they do happen.  In reporting on this story, tech blog Gizmodo cited a report which noted that approximately 40 to 50 decompression events happened every year throughout the world.  In October 2010, an American Airlines Boeing 757 experienced a decompression at 31,000 feet when a two-foot hole ripped open in its fuselage.  (There were no injuries.)

The FAA issued a statement, which includes the following:

Rapid decompression events on commercial aircraft are extremely rare.  If there is a sudden loss of cabin pressure, pilots are already trained to guide the aircraft to a safe, breathable altitude as quickly as possible.  Flight attendants are also already trained to assist passengers to quickly access oxygen – including those in the lavatories.

Until now, a passenger in a lavatory only had to worry about sudden turbulence.  Now they will also worry about a decompression event happening while they are using the facilities, and possibly the embarrassment of a flight attendant ripping open the lavatory door so s/he can drag you out into the aisle and back to your seat where there’s a working oxygen mask.

By the way, every airplane lavatory has a latch on the outside that allows anyone to open the door, even if you have it locked:

The FAA Airworthiness Directive contained this line as part of the instructions given to airlines:

For each chemical oxygen generator, after the generator is expended (or removed), remove or re-stow the oxygen masks and close the mask dispenser door.

So if you do happen to be in the lavatory during a decompression event, an oxygen mask will actually deploy above your head… but it will not work! You better hope there’s a flight attendant nearby to rescue you — and hopefully all the other passengers will be too preoccupied fiddling with their own masks that they won’t be able to take pictures of you being dragged down the aisle with your pants around your ankles…

[KPRC Local 2 via Gizmodo]

Posted in Air Travel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Napolitano: Airline baggage fees mean more cost to taxpayers

This week, while addressing a Congressional subcommittee, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that airline baggage fees make travelers carry more items on the plane with them, and it’s costing the Transportation Security Administration a quarter-billion dollars every year:

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Congress this week that luggage fees have prompted more passengers to hold onto their bags, which means more items for Transportation Security Administration officers to inspect at security checkpoints at a cost of about $260 million annually.

“When you have to pay to check a bag it increases carry-on luggage and that means there is more to inspect at the gate and so forth for passengers to get on planes,” Napolitano said during testimony before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security.

In her comments, Napolitano suggested that airlines should contribute some of their profits to the TSA: “My question is, do the taxpayers have to pick up this fee? Or should we be looking at the airlines for some of the profits that they make from these fees to offset the cost the taxpayer.”

The TSA is funded by the “September 11 Security Fee” that gets attached to tickets: $2.50 per flight segment, with no more than $5 charged per one-way trip.  According the the AP article, an increase in the fee has been proposed every year since its inception, but has never been approved by Congress. [AP via Yahoo! News]

Posted in Air Travel, Security | Tagged , , | Leave a comment